↓ Skip to main content

Easing the Burden: Describing the Role of Social, Emotional and Spiritual Support in Research Families with Li‐Fraumeni Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Easing the Burden: Describing the Role of Social, Emotional and Spiritual Support in Research Families with Li‐Fraumeni Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10897-015-9905-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

June A. Peters, Regina Kenen, Renee Bremer, Shannon Givens, Sharon A. Savage, Phuong L. Mai

Abstract

This study presents findings of a mixed-method descriptive exploration of the role of friends and spirituality/religiosity in easing the burden of families with the rare inherited disorder, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS). LFS is caused by germline mutations in the TP53 gene and is associated with very high lifetime risk of developing one or more malignancies. During the first clinical visit we assessed several types of social support among a subset of study participants (N = 66) using an established interactive research tool called the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM). We performed both quantitative and qualitative analyses of social relationships with LFS family members and close non-kin. Distress scores (N = 59) were mostly low normal, with some outliers. We found that reported friendships varied widely, that the friendships were often deep and enduring, and were important sources of informational, tangible, emotional and spiritual support. Confidantes tended to be best friends and/or spouses. Organized religion was important in selected families, typically from mainstream traditions. However, a number of people identified themselves as "spiritual" and reported spiritual and humanist explorations. Our results shed preliminary light on how some people in families with LFS cope in the face of tremendous medical, social and emotional challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,155,473
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#372
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,806
of 387,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.