↓ Skip to main content

Thinking About Theory in Educational Research: Fieldwork in philosophy

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Philosophy & Theory, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thinking About Theory in Educational Research: Fieldwork in philosophy
Published in
Educational Philosophy & Theory, May 2013
DOI 10.1080/00131857.2013.793928
Authors

Bob Lingard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 45%
Philosophy 4 9%
Engineering 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Educational Philosophy & Theory
#846
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,164
of 208,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Philosophy & Theory
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.