↓ Skip to main content

Referral frequency, attrition rate, and outcomes of germline testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Familial Cancer, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Referral frequency, attrition rate, and outcomes of germline testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Published in
Familial Cancer, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10689-018-0106-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan J. Walker, Julia Carnevale, Christina Pedley, Amie Blanco, Salina Chan, Eric A. Collisson, Margaret A. Tempero, Andrew H. Ko

Abstract

Hereditary predisposition is estimated to account for 10% of all pancreatic cancer cases. However, referral patterns and clinical workflow for germline testing in this disease differ significantly by institution, and many at-risk patients may not undergo appropriate counseling and testing. We undertook an analysis of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PDAC) who were referred to the Clinical Genetics program of a high-volume academic center over a 3-year period to assess referral frequency, evaluate the yield of germline testing in this selected patient cohort, and elucidate the reasons individuals did not undergo recommended germline testing. Medical records of patients with PDAC referred for genetic counseling between January 2015 and October 2017 were reviewed for demographic, medical/family history, and disease-specific data. If testing did not occur, reasons were documented. Genetic test results were categorized as negative, variants of unknown significance, or established pathogenic mutations. Descriptive statistics included means with standard deviations; associations were analyzed with t test and Fisher's exact test. 32% (137 of 432) of PDAC patients were referred for genetic counseling, but only 64% attended their appointment and 60% ultimately underwent germline testing. Common reasons for attrition included worsening disease severity, lack of patient follow-up, insurance concerns, and logistic/travel challenges. Pathogenic germline mutations were detected in 20% (16 of 82) of patients tested, distributed across races/ethnicities, and significantly associated with younger age and positive family history of breast cancer. PDAC patients frequently do not undergo genetic counseling/germline testing despite appropriate referrals, highlighting a need to develop streamlined processes to engage more patients in testing, especially those with high-risk features.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,580,738
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Familial Cancer
#359
of 594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,451
of 353,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Familial Cancer
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them