↓ Skip to main content

Air Pollution, Early Life Microbiome, and Development

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
Title
Air Pollution, Early Life Microbiome, and Development
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40572-018-0215-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Vallès, M. Pilar Francino

Abstract

We review how an altered microbiome in early life impacts on immune, metabolic, and neurological development, focusing on some of the most widespread diseases related to each of these processes, namely atopic disease, obesity, and autism. The early development of the microbial communities that inhabit the human body is currently challenged by factors that range from reduced exposure to microbes, antibiotic use, and poor dietary choices to widespread environmental pollution. Recent work has highlighted some of the long-term consequences that early alterations in the establishment of these microbiotas can have for different aspects of human development and health. The long-term consequences of early microbiome alterations for human development and health are only beginning to be understood and will require in-depth investigation in the years to come. A solid understanding of how present day environmental conditions alter microbiome development, and of how an altered microbiome in early life impacts on life-long health, should inform both public health policies and the development of dietary and medical strategies to counteract early microbiota imbalances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 285 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Master 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 3%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 188 66%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 10 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 197 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,290,798
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#90
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,791
of 343,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.