↓ Skip to main content

The molecular and phenotypic characterization of fructophilic lactic acid bacteria isolated from the guts of Apis mellifera L. derived from a Polish apiary

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Genetics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
The molecular and phenotypic characterization of fructophilic lactic acid bacteria isolated from the guts of Apis mellifera L. derived from a Polish apiary
Published in
Journal of Applied Genetics, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13353-018-0467-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artur Pachla, Magdalena Wicha, Aneta A. Ptaszyńska, Grzegorz Borsuk, Łucja Łaniewska –Trokenheim, Wanda Małek

Abstract

This paper describes taxonomic position, phylogeny, and phenotypic properties of 14 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) originating from an Apis mellifera guts. Based on the 16S rDNA and recA gene sequence analyses, 12 lactic acid bacteria were assigned to Lactobacillus kunkeei and two others were classified as Fructobacillus fructosus. Biochemically, all isolated lactic acid bacteria showed typical fructophilic features and under anaerobic conditions grew well on fructose, but poorly on glucose. Fast growth of bacteria on glucose was noted in the presence of oxygen or fructose as external electron acceptors. The residents of honeybee guts were classified as heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria. From glucose, they produced almost equimolar amounts of lactic acid, acetic acid, and trace amounts of ethanol. Furthermore, they inhibited the growth of the major honeybee pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae, meaning that the LAB studied may have the health-conferring properties of probiotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 22 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,478,342
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Genetics
#73
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,848
of 343,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Genetics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.