↓ Skip to main content

Immunotherapies in Alzheimer’s disease: Too much, too little, too late or off-target?

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Immunotherapies in Alzheimer’s disease: Too much, too little, too late or off-target?
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00401-015-1518-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle St-Amour, Francesca Cicchetti, Frédéric Calon

Abstract

Years of research have highlighted the importance of the immune system in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a system that, if manipulated during strategic time windows, could potentially be tackled to treat this disorder. However, to minimize adverse effects, it is essential to first grasp which exact aspect of it may be targeted. Several clues have been collected over the years regarding specific immune players strongly modulated during different stages of AD progression. However, the inherent complexity of the immune system as well as conflicting data make it quite challenging to pinpoint a specific immune target in AD. In this review, we discuss immune-related abnormalities observed in the periphery as well as in the brain of AD patients, in relation to known risk factors of AD such as genetics, type-2 diabetes or obesity, aging, physical inactivity and hypertension. Although not investigated yet in clinical trials, C5 complement system component, CD40/CD40L interactions and the CXCR2 pathway are altered in AD patients and may represent potential therapeutic targets. Immunotherapies tested in a clinical context, those aiming to attenuate the innate immune response and those used to facilitate the removal of pathological proteins, are further discussed to try and understand the causes of the limited success reached. The prevailing eagerness to move basic research data to clinic should not overshadow the fact that a careful preclinical characterization of a drug is still required to ultimately improve the chance of clinical success. Finally, specific elements to consider prior to initiate large-scale trials are highlighted and include the replication of preclinical data, the use of small-scale human studies, the sub-typing of AD patients and the determination of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics parameters such as brain bioavailability and target engagement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,248,993
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#548
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,481
of 389,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.