↓ Skip to main content

Expert recommendations for diagnosing cervical, oromandibular, and limb dystonia

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Expert recommendations for diagnosing cervical, oromandibular, and limb dystonia
Published in
Neurological Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10072-018-3586-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Defazio, Alberto Albanese, Roberta Pellicciari, Cesa L. Scaglione, Marcello Esposito, Francesca Morgante, Giovanni Abbruzzese, Anna R. Bentivoglio, Francesco Bono, Mario Coletti Moja, Giovanni Fabbrini, Paolo Girlanda, Leonardo Lopiano, Claudio Pacchetti, Marcello Romano, Laura Fadda, Alfredo Berardelli

Abstract

Diagnosis of focal dystonia is based on clinical grounds and is therefore open to bias. To date, diagnostic guidelines have been only proposed for blepharospasm and laryngeal dystonia. To provide practical guidance for clinicians with less expertise in dystonia, a group of Italian Movement Disorder experts formulated clinical diagnostic recommendations for cervical, oromandibular, and limb dystonia. A panel of four neurologists generated a list of clinical items related to the motor phenomenology of the examined focal dystonias and a list of clinical features characterizing neurological/non-neurological conditions mimicking dystonia. Thereafter, ten additional expert neurologists assessed the diagnostic relevance of the selected features and the content validity ratio was calculated. The clinical features reaching a content validity ratio > 0.5 contributed to the final recommendations. The recommendations retained patterned and repetitive movements/postures as the core feature of dystonia in different body parts. If present, a sensory trick confirmed diagnosis of dystonia. In the patients who did not manifest sensory trick, active exclusion of clinical features related to conditions mimicking dystonia (features that would be expected to be absent in dystonia) would be necessary for dystonia to be diagnosed. Although reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the recommendations are yet to be demonstrated, information from the present study would hopefully facilitate diagnostic approach to focal dystonias in the clinical practice and would be the basis for future validated diagnostic guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Neuroscience 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%