| Title |
The Replicator in Retrospect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1006704301415 |
| Authors |
Peter Godfrey-Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 90 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 30% |
| Philosophy | 19 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,401,269
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#347
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,139
of 39,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.