↓ Skip to main content

A thorough analysis of diabetes research in China from 1995 to 2015: current scenario and future scope

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
A thorough analysis of diabetes research in China from 1995 to 2015: current scenario and future scope
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11427-018-9377-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zekai Wu, Tianru Jin, Jianping Weng

Abstract

The prevalence of diabetes has increased dramatically over the past three decades, and currently, China has the largest number of diabetics worldwide; this number continues to grow and puts ongoing strains on the medical resources. In this review, we reviewed the diabetes research conducted in China from 1995 to 2015 with the aim of providing new insights regarding the current status and future perspectives for researchers, diabetes health providers, and respective policy-makers. Remarkable progress has been made in diabetes research in China during the past two decades in terms of both the quantity and publication influence. The progress, however, struggles to adequately manage diabetes in China. Here we addressed opportunities to strengthen researches, including new drug development, high quality studies on health economics, and healthcare quality improvement studies. As the expected wave of diabetic complications is upcoming and overwhelming, we therefore recommend that immediate improvements are required to implement the researches regarding their prevention and treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Psychology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 20 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,244,316
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#168
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,336
of 341,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.