Title |
Reproductive Trade-Offs and Direct Costs for Males in Arthropods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11692-012-9213-4 |
Authors |
Inon Scharf, Franziska Peter, Oliver Y. Martin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 159 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 15% |
Researcher | 22 | 13% |
Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 105 | 64% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
Psychology | 2 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,196,167
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#19
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,605
of 279,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.