You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recognizing Autoimmune-Mediated Encephalitis in the Differential Diagnosis of Limbic Disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a4408 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A.J. da Rocha, R.H. Nunes, A.C.M. Maia, L.L.F. do Amaral |
| Abstract |
Limbic encephalitis is far more common than previously thought. It is not always associated with cancer, and it is potentially treatable. Autoantibodies against various neuronal cell antigens may arise independently or in association with cancer and cause autoimmune damage to the limbic system. Neuroimaging plays a key role in the management of patients with suspected limbic encephalitis by supporting diagnosis and excluding differential possibilities. This article describes the main types of autoimmune limbic encephalitis and its mimic disorders, and emphasizes their major imaging features. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 26% |
| United States | 8 | 14% |
| Spain | 7 | 12% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 61% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,162,380
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#117
of 5,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,018
of 284,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.