↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
N2M2 (NOA-20) phase I/II trial of molecularly matched targeted therapies plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-MGMT hypermethylated glioblastoma
Published in
Neuro-Oncology, October 2018
DOI 10.1093/neuonc/noy161
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients with glioblastoma without O6-methyl guanine O6-methylatransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation are unlikely to benefit from alkylating chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ). Trials aiming at replacing TMZ with targeted agents in unselected patient populations have failed to demonstrate any improvement of survival. Advances in molecular understanding and diagnostic precision enable identification of key genetic alterations in a timely manner and in principle allow treatments with targeted compounds based on molecular markers. The NCT Neuro Master Match (N2M2) trial is an open label multicenter phase I/IIa umbrella trial for patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastoma without MGMT promoter hypermethylation to show safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of treatment with targeted compounds in addition to standard radiotherapy based on molecular characterization. N2M2 is formally divided in a DISCOVERY and a TREATMENT part. DISCOVERY includes broad molecular neuropathological diagnostics to detect predefined biomarkers for targeted treatments. Molecular diagnostics and bioinformatic evaluation are performed within four weeks, allowing a timely initiation of postoperative treatment. Stratification for TREATMENT takes place in five subtrials, including alectinib, idasanutlin, palbociclib, vismodegib and temsirolimus as targeted therapies, according to the best matching molecular alteration. Patients without matching alterations are randomized between subtrials without strong biomarkers using atezolizumab and asinercept (APG101), and the standard of care, TMZ. For the phase I parts, a Bayesian criterion is used for continuous monitoring of toxicity. In the phase II trials, progression-free survival at six months is used as endpoint for efficacy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 47 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 34%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 48 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,503,318
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Neuro-Oncology
#187
of 4,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,328
of 385,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuro-Oncology
#6
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.