| Title |
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 in Genetic Counseling Practice: Recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetic Counseling, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10897-007-9101-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather B. Radtke, Courtney D. Sebold, Caroline Allison, Joy Larsen Haidle, Gretchen Schneider |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,576,625
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#514
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,026
of 54,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them