↓ Skip to main content

Caveolins/caveolae protect adipocytes from fatty acid-mediated lipotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Lipid Research, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caveolins/caveolae protect adipocytes from fatty acid-mediated lipotoxicity
Published in
Journal of Lipid Research, June 2011
DOI 10.1194/jlr.m015628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tova Meshulam, Michael R. Breen, Libin Liu, Robert G. Parton, Paul F. Pilch

Abstract

Mice and humans lacking functional caveolae are dyslipidemic and have reduced fat stores and smaller fat cells. To test the role of caveolins/caveolae in maintaining lipid stores and adipocyte integrity, we compared lipolysis in caveolin-1 (Cav1)-null fat cells to that in cells reconstituted for caveolae by caveolin-1 re-expression. We find that the Cav1-null cells have a modestly enhanced rate of lipolysis and reduced cellular integrity compared with reconstituted cells as determined by the release of lipid metabolites and lactic dehydrogenase, respectively, into the media. There are no apparent differences in the levels of lipolytic enzymes or hormonally stimulated phosphorylation events in the two cell lines. In addition, acute fasting, which dramatically raises circulating fatty acid levels in vivo, causes a significant upregulation of caveolar protein constituents. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that caveolae protect fat cells from the lipotoxic effects of elevated levels fatty acids, which are weak detergents at physiological pH, by virtue of the property of caveolae to form detergent-resistant membrane domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Engineering 2 4%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Lipid Research
#4,420
of 4,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,509
of 123,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Lipid Research
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.