↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa: An Update

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa: An Update
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11920-015-0643-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Dalle Grave, Marwan El Ghoch, Massimiliano Sartirana, Simona Calugi

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anorexia nervosa (AN), based on Beck's cognitive theory, was developed in a "generic" form in the early eighties. In recent years, however, improved knowledge of the mechanisms involved in maintaining eating disorder psychopathology has led to the development of a "specific" form of CBT, termed CBT-E (E = enhanced), designed to treat all forms of eating disorders, including AN, from outpatient to inpatient settings. Although more studies are required to assess the relative effectiveness of CBT-E with respect to other available treatments, the data indicate that in outpatient settings it is both viable and promising for adults and adolescents with AN. Encouraging results are also emerging from inpatient CBT-E, particularly in adolescents, and clinical services offering CBT-E at different levels of care are now offered in several countries around the world. However, CBT-E requires dissemination in order to become widely available to patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 231 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 10 4%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 75 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,717,220
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#377
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,652
of 391,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#11
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.