| Title |
Resampling methods for evaluating classification accuracy of wildlife habitat models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, November 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01868317 |
| Authors |
David L. Verbyla, John A. Litvaitis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#403
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,734
of 14,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them