↓ Skip to main content

Random Effects Model for Multiple Pathway Analysis with Applications to Type II Diabetes Microarray Data

Overview of attention for article published in Statistics in Biosciences, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Random Effects Model for Multiple Pathway Analysis with Applications to Type II Diabetes Microarray Data
Published in
Statistics in Biosciences, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12561-014-9109-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Herbert Pang, Inyoung Kim, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract

Close to three percent of the world's population suffer from diabetes. Despite the range of treatment options available for diabetes patients, not all patients benefit from them. Investigating how different pathways correlate with phenotype of interest may help unravel novel drug targets and discover a possible cure. Many pathway-based methods have been developed to incorporate biological knowledge into the study of microarray data. Most of these methods can only analyze individual pathways but cannot deal with two or more pathways in a model based framework. This represents a serious limitation because, like genes, individual pathways do not work in isolation, and joint modeling may enable researchers to uncover patterns not seen in individual pathway-based analysis. In this paper, we propose a random effects model to analyze two or more pathways. We also derive score test statistics for significance of pathway effects. We apply our method to a microarray study of Type II diabetes. Our method may eludicate how pathways crosstalk with each other and facilitate the investigation of pathway crosstalks. Further hypothesis on the biological mechanisms underlying the disease and traits of interest may be generated and tested based on this method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,779,578
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Statistics in Biosciences
#44
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,479
of 307,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics in Biosciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them