↓ Skip to main content

Direct and indirect fossil records of megachilid bees from the Paleogene of Central Europe (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct and indirect fossil records of megachilid bees from the Paleogene of Central Europe (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Published in
The Science of Nature, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00114-009-0525-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonja Wedmann, Torsten Wappler, Michael S. Engel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 29%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 62%
Environmental Science 7 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,108,935
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#392
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,379
of 96,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.