↓ Skip to main content

Volcanic origin of the 1741 Oshima-Oshima tsunami in the Japan Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
21 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Volcanic origin of the 1741 Oshima-Oshima tsunami in the Japan Sea
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2007
DOI 10.1186/bf03352698
Authors

Kenji Satake

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 52%
Engineering 5 15%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Mathematics 2 6%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#517
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,589
of 82,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.