↓ Skip to main content

SHEER “smart” database: technical note

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Geophysica, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
SHEER “smart” database: technical note
Published in
Acta Geophysica, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11600-018-0205-3
Authors

Szymon Cielesta, Beata Orlecka-Sikora, Monika Staszek, Paweł Urban, Dorota Olszewska, Elmer Ruigrok, Sam Toon, Matteo Picozzi, Grzegorz Kwiatek, Simone Cesca, José Angel López Comino, Catherine Isherwood, Nelly Montcoudiol, Janusz Jarosławski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,546,615
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Acta Geophysica
#75
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,551
of 341,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Geophysica
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.