↓ Skip to main content

LARS versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-centre, single surgeon retrospective study with 8 years of follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
LARS versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a single-centre, single surgeon retrospective study with 8 years of follow-up
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00590-018-2304-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Bianchi, Federico Sacchetti, Vanna Bottai, Marco Gesi, Alessio Carlisi, Andrea Facchini, Rodolfo Capanna, Stefano Giannotti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,260,552
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#133
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,041
of 342,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.