↓ Skip to main content

Fungi in Antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Fungi in Antarctica
Published in
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11157-006-9107-y
Authors

Serena Ruisi, Donatella Barreca, Laura Selbmann, Laura Zucconi, Silvano Onofri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Chemistry 7 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 44 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,218,550
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#77
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,455
of 168,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.