↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Spring Bird Migration on the Range Expansion of Ixodes scapularis Tick Population

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Spring Bird Migration on the Range Expansion of Ixodes scapularis Tick Population
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11538-015-0133-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaotian Wu, Gergely Röst, Xingfu Zou

Abstract

Many observational studies suggest that seasonal migratory birds play an important role in spreading Ixodes scapularis, a vector of Lyme disease, along their migratory flyways, and they are believed to be responsible for geographic range expansion of I. scapularis in Canada. However, the interplay between the dynamics of I. scapularis on land and migratory birds in the air is not well understood. In this study, we develop a periodic delay meta-population model which takes into consideration the local landscape for tick reproduction within patches and the times needed for ticks to be transported by birds between patches. Assuming that the tick population is endemic in the source region, we find that bird migration may boost an already established tick population at the subsequent region and thus increase the risk to humans, or bird migration may help ticks to establish in a region where the local landscape is not appropriate for ticks to survive in the absence of bird migration, imposing risks to public health. This theoretical study reveals that bird migration plays an important role in the geographic range expansion of I. scapularis, and therefore our findings may suggest some strategies for Lyme disease prevention and control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#12,745,977
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#458
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,322
of 388,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.