| Title |
Transorbital penetrating head injury by a toilet brush handle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00701-009-0221-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. R. Farhadi, M. Becker, C. Stippich, A. W. Unterberg, K. L. Kiening |
| Abstract |
Transorbital penetrating brain injuries are rare lesions without defined therapy standards. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 18% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,119,347
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#385
of 1,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,209
of 94,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,972 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.