| Title |
The impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 on cadmium toxicity in Pyropia haitanensis (Rhodophyta)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-018-3289-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haiying Ma, Dinghui Zou, Jiayi Wen, Zhiwei Ji, Jingyu Gong, Chunxiang Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,029,485
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,101
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,347
of 344,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#25
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.