↓ Skip to main content

Berthierine and Chamosite in Coal Measures of Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Clays and Clay Minerals, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Berthierine and Chamosite in Coal Measures of Japan
Published in
Clays and Clay Minerals, April 2024
DOI 10.1346/ccmn.1982.0300403
Authors

Azuma Iljima, Ryo Matsumoto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 63%
Chemistry 3 10%
Energy 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,647,757
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Clays and Clay Minerals
#86
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,595
of 171,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clays and Clay Minerals
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them