↓ Skip to main content

Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00384-015-2473-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoki Asayama, Shiro Oka, Shinji Tanaka, Yuki Ninomiya, Yuzuru Tamaru, Kenjiro Shigita, Nana Hayashi, Hiroyuki Egi, Takao Hinoi, Hideki Ohdan, Koji Arihiro, Kazuaki Chayama

Abstract

Long-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) treated by endoscopic resection (ER) or surgical resection are unclear in relation to the curative criteria in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the long-term outcomes among patients with T1 CRC in relation to the treatment methods. We examined 322 T1 CRC cases treated between January 1992 and August 2008 at Hiroshima University Hospital. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria in the JSCCR guidelines were defined as "non-endoscopically curable" and classified into three groups: underwent ER alone (group A: 45 patients), underwent additional surgery after ER (group B: 106 patients), and underwent surgical resection alone (group C: 92 patients). Of the 322 T1 CRC patients, 79 were categorized as endoscopically curable and 243 as non-endoscopically curable. Among the endoscopically curable T1 CRC patients, recurrence and 5-year OS rates were 0 and 94.2 %, respectively. In groups A, B, and C, recurrence rates were 4.4, 6.6, and 4.3 %, and OS rates were 85.6, 95.1, and 96.3 %, respectively (p < 0.05). Local recurrence or distant/lymph node metastasis was observed in 13 patients (group A: 2; group B: 7; group C: 4). Death due to primary CRC occurred in six patients (group B: 4; group C: 2). Long-term outcomes support the curative criteria according to the JSCCR guidelines. ER for T1 CRC did not worsen clinical outcomes in cases that required additional surgical resection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,964,092
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#342
of 1,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,995
of 390,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#9
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.