↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Expanding the clinical phenotype of individuals with a 3-bp in-frame deletion of the NF1 gene (c.2970_2972del): an update of genotype–phenotype correlation

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Expanding the clinical phenotype of individuals with a 3-bp in-frame deletion of the NF1 gene (c.2970_2972del): an update of genotype–phenotype correlation
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41436-018-0326-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Koczkowska, Tom Callens, Alicia Gomes, Angela Sharp, Yunjia Chen, Alesha D. Hicks, Arthur S. Aylsworth, Amedeo A. Azizi, Donald G. Basel, Gary Bellus, Lynne M. Bird, Maria A. Blazo, Leah W. Burke, Ashley Cannon, Felicity Collins, Colette DeFilippo, Ellen Denayer, Maria C. Digilio, Shelley K. Dills, Laura Dosa, Robert S. Greenwood, Cristin Griffis, Punita Gupta, Rachel K. Hachen, Concepción Hernández-Chico, Sandra Janssens, Kristi J. Jones, Justin T. Jordan, Peter Kannu, Bruce R. Korf, Andrea M. Lewis, Robert H. Listernick, Fortunato Lonardo, Maurice J. Mahoney, Mayra Martinez Ojeda, Marie T. McDonald, Carey McDougall, Nancy Mendelsohn, David T. Miller, Mari Mori, Rianne Oostenbrink, Sebastién Perreault, Mary Ella Pierpont, Carmelo Piscopo, Dinel A. Pond, Linda M. Randolph, Katherine A. Rauen, Surya Rednam, S. Lane Rutledge, Veronica Saletti, G. Bradley Schaefer, Elizabeth K. Schorry, Daryl A. Scott, Andrea Shugar, Elizabeth Siqveland, Lois J. Starr, Ashraf Syed, Pamela L. Trapane, Nicole J. Ullrich, Emily G. Wakefield, Laurence E. Walsh, Michael F. Wangler, Elaine Zackai, Kathleen B. M. Claes, Katharina Wimmer, Rick van Minkelen, Alessandro De Luca, Yolanda Martin, Eric Legius, Ludwine M. Messiaen

Abstract

A correction has been published to this Article. The PDF and HTML have been updated accordingly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 50%
Unspecified 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,598
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,579
of 354,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#75
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.