| Title |
Elevators or stairs?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.110961 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sachin Shah, Michael O'Byrne, Merne Wilson, Thomas Wilson |
| Abstract |
Staff in hospitals frequently travel between floors and choose between taking the stairs or elevator. We compared the time savings with these two options. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 26% |
| United States | 9 | 17% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 30% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#626,699
of 25,142,442 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,012
of 9,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,352
of 254,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#10
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,142,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.