You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aquatic carbon cycling in the conterminous United States and implications for terrestrial carbon accounting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1512651112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Butman, Sarah Stackpoole, Edward Stets, Cory P. McDonald, David W. Clow, Robert G. Striegl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 55% |
| Sweden | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 337 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 23% |
| Researcher | 66 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 79 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 108 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 53 | 15% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 94 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#573,666
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9,917
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,585
of 400,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#190
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.