↓ Skip to main content

Brain scans from 21,297 individuals reveal the genetic architecture of hippocampal subfield volumes

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Psychiatry, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain scans from 21,297 individuals reveal the genetic architecture of hippocampal subfield volumes
Published in
Molecular Psychiatry, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41380-018-0262-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis van der Meer, Jaroslav Rokicki, Tobias Kaufmann, Aldo Córdova-Palomera, Torgeir Moberget, Dag Alnæs, Francesco Bettella, Oleksandr Frei, Nhat Trung Doan, Ida E. Sønderby, Olav B. Smeland, Ingrid Agartz, Alessandro Bertolino, Janita Bralten, Christine L. Brandt, Jan K. Buitelaar, Srdjan Djurovic, Marjolein van Donkelaar, Erlend S. Dørum, Thomas Espeseth, Stephen V. Faraone, Guillén Fernández, Simon E. Fisher, Barbara Franke, Beathe Haatveit, Catharina A. Hartman, Pieter J. Hoekstra, Asta K. Håberg, Erik G. Jönsson, Knut K. Kolskår, Stephanie Le Hellard, Martina J. Lund, Astri J. Lundervold, Arvid Lundervold, Ingrid Melle, Jennifer Monereo Sánchez, Linn C. Norbom, Jan E. Nordvik, Lars Nyberg, Jaap Oosterlaan, Marco Papalino, Andreas Papassotiropoulos, Giulio Pergola, Dominique J. F. de Quervain, Geneviève Richard, Anne-Marthe Sanders, Pierluigi Selvaggi, Elena Shumskaya, Vidar M. Steen, Siren Tønnesen, Kristine M. Ulrichsen, Marcel P. Zwiers, Ole A. Andreassen, Lars T. Westlye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 18 11%
Professor 12 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 31 19%
Psychology 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 53 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,443,455
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#1,101
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,930
of 344,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#26
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.