↓ Skip to main content

Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
Title
Colony growth of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats
Published in
Oecologia, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/s004420100803
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Goulson, W. Hughes, L. Derwent, J. Stout

Abstract

Many bumblebee species are declining at a rapid rate in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. This is commonly attributed to the decline in floral resources that has resulted from an intensification in farming practices. Here we assess growth of nests of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, in habitats providing different levels of floral resources. Experimental nests were placed out in conventional farmland, in farmland with flower-rich conservation measures and in suburban areas. Nests gained weight more quickly and attained a larger final size in suburban areas compared to elsewhere. The diversity of pollens gathered by bees was highest in suburban areas, and lowest in conventional farmland. Nests in suburban areas were also more prone to attack by the specialist bumblebee parasite Aphomia sociella, suggesting that this moth is more abundant in suburban areas than elsewhere. Overall, our results demonstrate that gardens provide a greater density and diversity of floral resources than farmland, and probably support larger populations of B. terrestris. Contrary to expectation, schemes deployed to enhance farmland biodiversity appear to have little measurable impact on nest growth of this bumblebee species. We argue that B. terrestris probably forage over a larger scale than that on which farms are managed, so that nest growth is determined by the management of a large number of neighbouring farms, not just that in which the nest is located.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Brazil 8 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 393 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 21%
Researcher 77 18%
Student > Master 67 16%
Student > Bachelor 57 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 47 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 256 59%
Environmental Science 76 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Engineering 4 <1%
Arts and Humanities 4 <1%
Other 20 5%
Unknown 59 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,964,092
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,526
of 4,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,253
of 122,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.