| Title |
Radiographic analysis of lumbar spine for low-back pain in the general population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00013766 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Inaoka, Yuji Yamazaki, Noboru Hosono, Koichi Tada, Kazuo Yonenobu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,760,001
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#122
of 1,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,751
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them