↓ Skip to main content

Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, November 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:jcam.0000017496.76572.6f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Badry D. Bursulaya, Maxim Totrov, Ruben Abagyan, Charles L. Brooks

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Brazil 3 1%
India 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 240 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 19%
Researcher 45 17%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 62 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 14%
Computer Science 19 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 46 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#420
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,261
of 57,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.