↓ Skip to main content

Effects of vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk among people at risk of type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk among people at risk of type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/dom.12625
Pubmed ID
Authors

N G Forouhi, R K Menon, S J Sharp, N Mannan, P M Timms, A R Martineau, A P Rickard, B J Boucher, T A Chowdhury, C J Griffiths, S E Greenwald, S J Griffin, G A Hitman

Abstract

Although an inverse association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration and type 2 diabetes and coronary risk exists, a causal link has not been established. We investigated the effect of short-term vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic outcomes among individuals at increased diabetes risk. In a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial, 340 adults at increased type 2 diabetes risk (non-diabetic hyperglycaemia or positive diabetes risk score) were randomised to either placebo, 100,000 IU Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) or 100,000 IU Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), orally administered monthly for four months. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) between baseline and four months, adjusted for baseline. Secondary outcomes included: blood pressure, lipids, apolipoproteins, C-reactive protein, pulse wave velocity (PWV), anthropometric measures and safety of supplementation. Mean (SD) 25(OH)D2 concentration increased from 5.2 (4.1) to 53.9 (18.5) nmol/l in D2 group, and 25(OH)D3 from 45.8 (22.6) to 83.8 (22.7) nmol/l in D3 . There was no effect of vitamin D supplementation on HbA1c : D2 versus placebo: -0.51 (-1.16, 0.14) mmol/mol;p = 0.13; [-0.05% (95%CI -0.11%, 0.02%)]; D3 versus placebo: 0.19 (-0.46, 0.83) mmol/mol;p = 0.57; [0.02% (-0.04%, 0.08%)]. There were no clinically meaningful effects on secondary outcomes, except PWV [D2 versus placebo:-0.68 (-1.31, -0.05) m/s; D3 versus placebo -0.73 (-1.42, -0.03) m/s]. No important safety issues were identified. Short-term supplementation with vitamin D2 or D3 had no effect on HbA1c . The modest reduction in PWV with both D2 and D3 relative to placebo suggests a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation on arterial stiffness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 57 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,568,561
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#921
of 3,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,809
of 405,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#11
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.