↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Present Time Perspective in Predicting Early Adolescent Violence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interpersonal Violence, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Present Time Perspective in Predicting Early Adolescent Violence
Published in
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, December 2015
DOI 10.1177/0886260515619752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Kruger, Jessica Carrothers, Susan P. Franzen, Alison L. Miller, Thomas M. Reischl, Sarah A. Stoddard, Marc A. Zimmerman

Abstract

This study investigated the role of present and future time perspectives, and their relationships with subjective norms and beliefs regarding violence, in predicting violent behaviors among urban middle school students in the Midwestern United States. Although present time perspective covaried with subjective norms and beliefs, each made a unique prediction of self-reported violent behaviors. Future time perspective was not a significant predictor when accounting for these relationships. In addition, present orientation moderated the relationship between subjective norms and beliefs and rates of violent behaviors; those with higher present orientations exhibited stronger associations. We replicated this pattern of results in data from new participants in a subsequent wave of the study. Interventions that explicitly address issues related to time perspective may be effective in reducing early adolescent violence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Other 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 29%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%