↓ Skip to main content

“Cartesian” linguistics?

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophia, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
“Cartesian” linguistics?
Published in
Philosophia, December 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02380646
Authors

Justin Leiber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Netherlands 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 130 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 23%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 10%
Professor 14 10%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 58 40%
Arts and Humanities 13 9%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Psychology 10 7%
Computer Science 8 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 17 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,695,695
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Philosophia
#133
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,429
of 54,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them