| Title |
A systematic review of compliance with indoor tanning legislation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-5994-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Reimann, Jennifer E. McWhirter, Andrew Papadopoulos, Cate Dewey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Librarian | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#717,936
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#736
of 15,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,264
of 344,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.