↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular focus editorial ICM 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Cardiovascular focus editorial ICM 2018
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5396-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Aneman, A. Vieillard-Baron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Librarian 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,801,532
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,497
of 5,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,946
of 344,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#114
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.