↓ Skip to main content

Tetraselmis suecica culture for CO2 bioremediation of untreated flue gas from a coal-fired power station

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Phycology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Tetraselmis suecica culture for CO2 bioremediation of untreated flue gas from a coal-fired power station
Published in
Journal of Applied Phycology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10811-015-0782-3
Authors

N. R. Moheimani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,225,144
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#418
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,369
of 390,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.