↓ Skip to main content

A Recurrent De Novo Heterozygous COG4 Substitution Leads to Saul-Wilson Syndrome, Disrupted Vesicular Trafficking, and Altered Proteoglycan Glycosylation

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Recurrent De Novo Heterozygous COG4 Substitution Leads to Saul-Wilson Syndrome, Disrupted Vesicular Trafficking, and Altered Proteoglycan Glycosylation
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos R. Ferreira, Zhi-Jie Xia, Aurélie Clément, David A. Parry, Mariska Davids, Fulya Taylan, Prashant Sharma, Coleman T. Turgeon, Bernardo Blanco-Sánchez, Bobby G. Ng, Clare V. Logan, Lynne A. Wolfe, Benjamin D. Solomon, Megan T. Cho, Ganka Douglas, Daniel R. Carvalho, Heiko Bratke, Marte Gjøl Haug, Jennifer B. Phillips, Jeremy Wegner, Michael Tiemeyer, Kazuhiro Aoki, Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Scottish Genome Partnership, Ann Nordgren, Anna Hammarsjö, Angela L. Duker, Luis Rohena, Hanne Buciek Hove, Jakob Ek, David Adams, Cynthia J. Tifft, Tito Onyekweli, Tara Weixel, Ellen Macnamara, Kelly Radtke, Zöe Powis, Dawn Earl, Melissa Gabriel, Alvaro H. Serrano Russi, Lauren Brick, Mariya Kozenko, Emma Tham, Kimiyo M. Raymond, John A. Phillips, George E. Tiller, William G. Wilson, Rizwan Hamid, May C.V. Malicdan, Nishimura, Giedre Grigelioniene, Andrew Jackson, Monte Westerfield, Michael B. Bober, William A. Gahl, Hudson H. Freeze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#876,326
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#464
of 5,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,815
of 351,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#12
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.