↓ Skip to main content

Perceptual Grouping, Not Emotion, Accounts for Search Asymmetries With Schematic Faces

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptual Grouping, Not Emotion, Accounts for Search Asymmetries With Schematic Faces
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance, January 2011
DOI 10.1037/a0024665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie I. Becker, Gernot Horstmann, Roger W. Remington

Abstract

Several different explanations have been proposed to account for the search asymmetry (SA) for angry schematic faces (i.e., the fact that an angry face target among friendly faces can be found faster than vice versa). The present study critically tested the perceptual grouping account, (a) that the SA is not due to emotional factors, but to perceptual differences that render angry faces more salient than friendly faces, and (b) that the SA is mainly attributable to differences in distractor grouping, with angry faces being more difficult to group than friendly faces. In visual search for angry and friendly faces, the number of distractors visible during each fixation was systematically manipulated using the gaze-contingent window technique. The results showed that the SA emerged only when multiple distractors were visible during a fixation, supporting the grouping account. To distinguish between emotional and perceptual factors in the SA, we altered the perceptual properties of the faces (dented-chin face) so that the friendly face became more salient. In line with the perceptual account, the SA was reversed for these faces, showing faster search for a friendly face target. These results indicate that the SA reflects feature-level perceptual grouping, not emotional valence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
India 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 63 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 59%
Engineering 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Design 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 22%