↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Quality Affects the Rate of Male and Female Reproductive Aging Differently in Drosophila melanogaster.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Naturalist, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Quality Affects the Rate of Male and Female Reproductive Aging Differently in Drosophila melanogaster.
Published in
The American Naturalist, October 2018
DOI 10.1086/700117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Brengdahl, Christopher M Kimber, Jack Maguire-Baxter, Antonino Malacrinò, Urban Friberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#713,563
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#141
of 3,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,501
of 355,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.