You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Anorexia Nervosa Genetics Initiative (ANGI): Overview and methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contemporary Clinical Trials, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura M Thornton, Melissa A Munn-Chernoff, Jessica H Baker, Anders Juréus, Richard Parker, Anjali K Henders, Janne T Larsen, Liselotte Petersen, Hunna J Watson, Zeynep Yilmaz, Katherine M Kirk, Scott Gordon, Virpi M Leppä, Felicity C Martin, David C Whiteman, Catherine M Olsen, Thomas M Werge, Nancy L Pedersen, Walter Kaye, Andrew W Bergen, Katherine A Halmi, Michael Strober, Allan S Kaplan, D Blake Woodside, James Mitchell, Craig L Johnson, Harry Brandt, Steven Crawford, L John Horwood, Joseph M Boden, John F Pearson, Laramie E Duncan, Jakob Grove, Manuel Mattheisen, Jennifer Jordan, Martin A Kennedy, Andreas Birgegård, Paul Lichtenstein, Claes Norring, Tracey D Wade, Grant W Montgomery, Nicholas G Martin, Mikael Landén, Preben Bo Mortensen, Patrick F Sullivan, Cynthia M Bulik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,214,093
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#225
of 1,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,349
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.