↓ Skip to main content

Cryopreserved Interleukin-4-Treated Macrophages Attenuate Murine Colitis in an Integrin β7-Dependent Manner

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Cryopreserved Interleukin-4-Treated Macrophages Attenuate Murine Colitis in an Integrin β7-Dependent Manner
Published in
Molecular Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2015.00193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriella Leung, Björn Petri, José Luis Reyes, Arthur Wang, Jordan Iannuzzi, Derek M. McKay

Abstract

The adoptive transfer of alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) has proven to attenuate inflammation in multiple mouse models of colitis, however the effect of cryopreservation on AAMs, the ability of previously frozen AAMs to block DNBS (Th1) and oxazolone (Th2) colitis, and their migration post-injection remains unknown. Here we have found that while cryopreservation reduced mRNA expression of canonical markers of IL-4-treated macrophages [M(IL-4)], this did not translate to reduced protein or activity and the cells retained their capacity to drive the suppression of colitis. The anti-colitic effect of M(Il-4) adoptive transfer required neither T or B cell nor peritoneal macrophages in the recipient. Following injection into the peritoneal cavity, M(IL-4s) migrated to the spleen, MLNs and colon of DNBS-treated mice. The chemokines CCL2, CCL4, and CX3CL1 were expressed in the colon during the course of DNBS-induced colitis. The expression of integrin β7 on transferred M(IL-4)s was required for their anti-colitic effect, while the presence of the chemokine receptors CCR2 and CX3CR1 were dispensable in this model. Collectively the data show that M(IL-4)s can be cryopreserved M(IL-4)s and subsequently used to suppress colitis in an integrin β7-dependent manner and we suggest that these proof-of-concept studies may lead to need cellular therapies for human inflammatory bowel disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#1,000
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,292
of 389,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.