↓ Skip to main content

Myasthenia gravis: a clinical-immunological update

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Myasthenia gravis: a clinical-immunological update
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7963-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Binks, Angela Vincent, Jacqueline Palace

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the archetypic disorder of both the neuromuscular junction and autoantibody-mediated disease. In most patients, IgG1-dominant antibodies to acetylcholine receptors cause fatigable weakness of skeletal muscles. In the rest, a variable proportion possesses antibodies to muscle-specific tyrosine kinase while the remainder of seronegative MG is being explained through cell-based assays using a receptor-clustering technique and, to a lesser extent, proposed new antigenic targets. The incidence and prevalence of MG are increasing, particularly in the elderly. New treatments are being developed, and results from the randomised controlled trial of thymectomy in non-thymomatous MG, due for release in early 2016, will be of particular clinical value. To help navigate an evidence base of varying quality, practising clinicians may consult new MG guidelines in the fields of pregnancy, ocular and generalised MG (GMG). This review focuses on updates in epidemiology, immunology, therapeutic and clinical aspects of GMG in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 285 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 15%
Student > Master 31 11%
Other 27 9%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 60 21%
Unknown 78 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 39%
Neuroscience 33 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 88 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,719,214
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,585
of 4,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,328
of 390,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#21
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.