↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7986-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tjalf Ziemssen, Tobias Derfuss, Nicola de Stefano, Gavin Giovannoni, Filipe Palavra, Davorka Tomic, Tim Vollmer, Sven Schippling

Abstract

Despite important advances in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) over recent years, the introduction of several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), the burden of progressive disability and premature mortality associated with the condition remains substantial. This burden, together with the high healthcare and societal costs associated with MS, creates a compelling case for early treatment optimization with highly efficacious therapies. Often, patients receive several first-line therapies, while more recent and in part more effective treatments are still being introduced only after these have failed. However, with the availability of highly efficacious therapies, a novel treatment strategy has emerged, where the aim is to achieve no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). Achieving NEDA necessitates regular monitoring of relapses, disability and functionality. However, there is only a poor correlation between conventional magnetic resonance imaging measures like T2 hyperintense lesion burden and the level of clinical disability. Hence, MRI-based measures of brain atrophy have emerged in recent years potentially reflecting the magnitude of MS-related neuroaxonal damage. Currently available DMTs differ markedly in their effects on brain atrophy: some, such as fingolimod, have been shown to significantly slow brain volume loss, compared to placebo, whereas others have shown either no, inconsistent, or delayed effects. In addition to regular monitoring, treatment optimization also requires early intervention with efficacious therapies, because accumulating evidence shows that effective intervention during a limited period early in the course of MS is critical for maintaining neurological function and preventing subsequent disability. Together, the advent of new MS therapies and evolving management strategies offer exciting new opportunities to optimize treatment outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 270 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 40 14%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 35%
Neuroscience 31 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 80 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,147,421
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#349
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,100
of 401,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.