↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism design for land acquisition

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Game Theory, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Mechanism design for land acquisition
Published in
International Journal of Game Theory, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00182-016-0556-4
Authors

Soumendu Sarkar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 27%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Philosophy 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,546,615
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#94
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,724
of 312,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them