↓ Skip to main content

Chloroquine efficacy for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment in southern Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chloroquine efficacy for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment in southern Ethiopia
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-1041-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sisay Getachew, Kamala Thriemer, Sarah Auburn, Adugna Abera, Endalamaw Gadisa, Abraham Aseffa, Ric N. Price, Beyene Petros

Abstract

Chloroquine (CQ) is the first-line treatment for vivax malaria in Ethiopia, but there is evidence for its declining efficacy. Defining the extent and regional distribution of CQ resistance is critical to ensure optimal treatment guidelines. This study aimed to provide data on the therapeutic efficacy of CQ against Plasmodium vivax malaria in southern Ethiopia. Patients with P. vivax mono-infection aged between 8 months and 65 years were enrolled in a clinical efficacy trial. The study was conducted at four sites in southern Ethiopia. Study participants were treated with a supervised course of CQ (25 mg/kg over three consecutive days), followed by weekly blood film examination and clinical assessment for 28 days. CQ blood concentrations were not assessed. The primary endpoint was the risk of failure at 28 days by survival analysis. Between May 2010 and December 2013, 288 patients were enrolled in the study (n = 89 in Shele, n = 52 in Guba, n = 57 in Batu and n = 90 in Shone). Baseline characteristics varied significantly between sites. In total 34 (11.8 %) patients were censored during follow up (five with Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia and 29 lost to follow up). Two (0.7 %) patients experienced early treatment failure and 23 (8 %) late treatment failure. The overall risk of recurrence by day 28 was 9.4 % (95 % CI 6.4-13.6 %) with site-specific estimates of 3.8 % (95 % CI 1.2-11.3) for Shele, 21.9 % (95 % CI 12.2-36.1) for Guba, 5.9 % (95 % CI 1.9-17.3) for Batu and 9.2 % (95 % CI 4.5-17.6) for Shone. There is evidence of reduced CQ efficacy across three of the four study sites, with the degree of resistance severe enough in Guba to suggest that review of treatment policy may be warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,867,931
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,799
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,026
of 400,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#47
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.