↓ Skip to main content

致死性毒きのこ,ニセクロハツの毒成分

Overview of attention for article published in KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 618)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
67 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
致死性毒きのこ,ニセクロハツの毒成分
Published in
KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU, January 2009
DOI 10.1271/kagakutoseibutsu.47.600
Authors

橋本 貴美子, 松浦 正憲, 犀川 陽子, 中田 雅也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#905,390
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU
#7
of 618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,037
of 185,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.